Market review
We study your market, your competitors and the patients you want before a dollar is spent.
Google and Meta campaigns, creative and landing pages built for one kind of patient: someone ready to consider full-arch treatment, in your market, now.
We score the competition in your market first. That score decides how your budget splits between Google and Meta, instead of habit or a package.
Campaigns target the ZIP codes where patients can afford full-arch treatment, and bids move ZIP by ZIP as cost per lead changes.
We grade leads on intent and manage to booked consults and treatment starts, never to the cheapest lead volume.
Every account is monitored daily. When one slips, a full review of tracking, delivery, budget and creative starts right away.
Spend climbs month after month while booked consults stay where they were.
Campaigns reach people who were never looking for implants, and the budget goes with them.
You can see clicks and leads. Nobody can show you which ad produced a started case.
We study your market, your competitors and the patients you want before a dollar is spent.
Google captures patients already searching. Meta builds trust with the ones who are not yet.
Ads and pages built around your doctors and your cases, so patients arrive knowing who you are.
We manage the campaigns against consults and starts, not against cheap leads.
Part of both DIM Generate and DIM Convert.
Dental implant advertising works when it is built for one decision: reaching the people in your market who are ready to consider full-arch treatment, and managing the campaigns against started cases rather than against the cheapest available click.
General dental marketing sells a visit. Implant advertising sells a decision the patient has often been avoiding for years, that costs more than any dentistry they will ever buy, and that they will discuss at home before they do anything at all. Almost everything that works for a hygiene special fails here.
We do not run hygiene campaigns or clear-aligner campaigns. That is a positioning choice and also a practical one, because the targeting, the creative and the follow-up for full-arch have almost nothing in common with them.
Both, doing different jobs. The question is usually asked as though one channel has to win, and practices that force the choice tend to end up with either too few patients or too many unqualified ones.
| Meta | ||
|---|---|---|
| What it reaches | People already searching for a solution | People living with the problem who have not started looking |
| Intent at first contact | High, and priced accordingly | Lower, and far cheaper to reach |
| The job it does | Captures demand that already exists in your market | Builds demand, and keeps you visible through a long decision |
| What it cannot do alone | Reach the much larger group who have not begun searching | Catch a patient in the moment they are ready to act |
| What to watch | Search terms drifting to general dentistry and out of area | Lead quality, and creative fatigue as the same audience sees it repeatedly |
The two channels in a full-arch campaign. How the budget splits between them is a market decision, not a package.
A competitive market with high search costs supports a different split from a market where nobody is bidding, which is why we score the market before launch rather than applying a standard allocation.
Creative decides more of the outcome than targeting does, and it is the part a practice has least control over when it buys advertising built from a template.
When a practice tells us its advertising is not working, the advertising is the cause less than half the time. These are the leaks, in the order we check them.
Only the first three are advertising problems. Spending more against the first three while the last three are open is the single most expensive mistake in full-arch marketing, and it is why our Find Your Gap assessment asks about the whole path rather than about the campaigns.
By started cases, and by return on ad spend, which is treatment value divided by ad spend. Clicks, impressions and cost per lead are diagnostic numbers. They are useful for working out why the real number moved, and they are not the real number.
The six practices we report are set out side by side, with what each figure measures and over how long, in our dental marketing case studies.
Those figures are for DIM clients over the periods shown, with treatment value reported by each practice. The range is wide because the practices are different sizes in different markets with different close rates. Any agency quoting you a single expected multiple before it has looked at your market is selling you a number rather than a forecast.
Every one of these figures is reported to the practice as it accumulates, rather than arriving afterwards in a monthly summary.
Leads arrive quickly. Started cases do not, and the gap between the two is the most misread period in the whole relationship.
A patient who inquires this week books a consultation, attends it, usually thinks about it, arranges financing, and then appears on a surgical schedule that is already partly full. A month of advertising is therefore judged properly over a quarter rather than over the month itself. Practices that judge the first four weeks on started cases tend to conclude the advertising failed at precisely the point the first patients are deciding.
What should be judged in the first weeks is different: whether leads are arriving in the right area with the right treatment intent, whether they are being reached quickly, and whether consultations are being booked and showing up. Those are visible immediately, and every one of them predicts what the started cases will look like.
The most useful questions sit outside the advertising. They are about what happens to a lead once it exists.
Our guide on how to choose a dental implant marketing company sets these out at greater length, along with the answers that should worry you. If you would rather start with your own practice than with a vendor, Find Your Gap names which of the three gates is costing you cases, and the answer is not always the advertising.
Their marketing support has been incredibly helpful, responsive, and customized to fit the unique needs of our practice. They truly take the time to answer all of our questions and continuously tweak the marketing strategy to help us grow and reach the right patients.
Our previous marketing company cost us a significant amount of money, yet we didn't close a single case⦠within just 30 days we were closing major All-on-4 cases in our oral surgery practice.
It's a testament to the power of teamwork and innovation in the field of dentistry. I couldn't have achieved this without the incredible support of my team and the solutions provided by Dental Implant Machine.
Dr. DelroseAward recipient, multiple yearsBoth, doing different jobs. Google captures patients already searching for a solution. Meta reaches the larger group who have been living with the problem and builds trust before they are ready to book.
Ad spend is billed at cost to the practice's own card, with no markup.
Campaigns go live after onboarding and the market review. The number that matters is started cases, which we report from the first month.
Bring your numbers. You will leave knowing where the practice is breaking, whether or not we work together.